Ukip insiders always used to say that while their partys constitution had plenty of articles, it only had one rule: “Nigel always wins”. But now Nigel Farage, the partys founder, leader and biggest media asset has quit the party over citing irreconcilable disagreements with its new leader, Gerard Batten.
The cause for Farages exit, according to the man himself in a piece written for the Telegraph, is Battens decision to appoint the far-right agitator Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, an advisor. Farage describes Yaxley-Lennon as “entirely unsuitable to be involved in any political party”, citing his entourage of “violent criminals and ex-BNP members”, and says that the failure of Ukips ruling national executive committee to trigger a vote of no confidence in Battens leadership has pushed him to quit.
Theres a lot to get into here. Farages political success was in winning over not just the votes of far-right parties like the BNP but in pulling over supporters of the Conservative and Labour parties who had similar attitudes to BNP voters but would not vote for an explicitly racist party. He was – for the most part – able to instead offer an implicit message about immigration and people from abroad. Ukips electoral success worried David Cameron enough for him to pledge an In-Out referendum, and while Ukips toxicity outside the 15 per cent of voters who backed the party was undoubtedly a drag anchor for Leave, without Ukip, Brexiteers would never have had their big shot.
Now Ukip has become a party that is offering an explicit far right message, and has started to abandon electoral politics for the politics of the street, and Farages fear is that it will struggle to repeat, let alone exceed, the electoral successes of Ukip.
There are three important questions here. The first is: will voters notice? We know that Ukip has started to pick up in the polls since ministers started to resign from the government and talk of Brexit being “sold out”. What we dont know is whether that is solely because if you are angry about the governments Brexit strategy, you know that the lever to pull is to vote Ukip, or if some of that support is down to Battens embrace of explicit Islamophobia and the decision to closely identify Ukip with the far rights online provocateurs.
The second is: will voters care? Farages political strategy was always based around the idea that unless Ukip publicly eschewed the far right it would never do well enough to achieve its big political strategy. Of course, that Batten could become an MEP under Farage is a demonstration of the extent to which that was a strategy rather than a principle. But it may be that Farages strategy is no longer necessary and that Ukip can now win not just the votes of an extremist fringe but a significant number of voters who are semi-sympathetic to some extremist views. It may even be that such a party now passes muster as an acceptable repository of discontent more broadly.
And the third question is what Farage intends to do next. “There is a huge space for a Brexit party in British politics, but it wont be filled by Ukip” is the final line of his column. Although Farage often speaks of his dislike of the sacrifices he has had to make for politics, of the pain he still feels daily from his plane crash in 2010, his appetite for the limelight has not gone away. It may be that he believes that his brand of outwardly respectable rightwing politics might do very well in a new Brexit party.
Stephen Bush is special correspondent at the New Statesman. His daily briefing, Morning Call, provides a quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics.
[contf]
[contfnew]
new statesman america
[contfnewc]
[contfnewc]
