Because everything is racist in 2018, a US sci-fi writer has blasted JRR Tolkien for his portrayal of orcs in the Lord of the Rings. He claimed they were simply misunderstood, comparing them to todays migrants and refugees.
In Tolkiens fantasy world, the orcs – described as black-blooded, flesh-eating goblin-men – were created by the dark lord Morgoth to serve his quest to dominate Middle-Earth. Dwelling in the caves and wastes of Mordor, the orcs would eventually serve as footsoldiers of Sauron, a lesser dark lord who sought to subjugate all of Middle-Earths free peoples.
Science fiction and fantasy author Andy Duncan, however, thinks this is all a bit… problematic.
“It's hard to miss the repeated notion in Tolkien that some races are just worse than others, or that some peoples are just worse than others,” he told Geeks Guide to the Galaxy, a podcast run by Wired magazine.
“I can easily imagine that a lot of these people that were doing the dark lord's bidding were doing so out of simple self preservation and so forth,” he added, ironically echoing the just following orders defense that Nazi war criminals used at Nuremberg.
Rather than drive Saurons armies back from the walls of Minas Tirith with sword and spear, Duncan argued that Gandalf the White (supremacist?) and the leaders of men and elves should simply have let them in. After all, the orcs probably brought great cuisine and some much-needed cultural enrichment to Gondor.
"It is easier to demonize one's opponents than to try to understand them and to understand the complex forces that are leading to, for example, refugees trying to cross the southern [US] border legally or illegally,” Duncan pontificated, adding:
It's easier to build walls and demonize them as scum'.
Whereas President Donald Trump wants a wall to deal with border-jumpers and rock-throwers, the Denethor administration had to contend with armored war-trolls and trebuchets raining severed human heads down on Gondors terrified population.
Still, if the modern media had been around during the War of the Ring, what would they have made of Tolkiens heroes last stand against the Orcish horde of Mordor? Bigotry? Racism? Shameless elven supremacy?
Bizarrely, Duncans argument actually sounds like the #orcposting memes – which use the world of Tolkien to mock the modern left – taken at face value. If liberal journalists existed in Middle-Earth, the orcposters joked, surely they would have pointed out that #notallorcs are responsible for acts of radical Orcish terrorism. There may have even been long-read think-pieces justifying the orcs behavior as noble cultural traditions.
This is not the first time Tolkien and his fantasy magnum opus have come under fire for “racism,” either. In 2002, amid the theatrical release of Peter Jacksons film adaptations, cultural studies professor Dr. Stephen Shapiro wrote that “Tolkien's good guys are white and the bad guys are black, slant-eyed, unattractive, inarticulate and a psychologically undeveloped horde.”
Some Tolkien fans have responded to Duncans claims by arguing that the orcs were the actual racists, using Tolkiens letters and the novels themselves as proof.
No, Tolkien wasn't racist with Orcs. In Letter #144, he said "orc" comes from Old English for "demon". Demons were "corruptions" of Angels, Orcs were corrupted servants of Sauron. In Letter #153, they're "counterfeits" of other pre-existing creatures. https://t.co/YBeYgWWF8o
— Chris Whisonant (@cwhisonant) November 27, 2018
Currently re-reading TTT… Pretty sure its the Orcs who are the racists, not the author WHO INVENTED THEM!!
Are we not allowed to root against treacherous FICTIONAL cannibals anymore?!
pic.twitter.com/ATsbwnuzWU
— Stephen Nelson (@scotsactor) November 27, 2018
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
[contf]
[contfnew]
RT
[contfnewc]
[contfnewc]
